Pages

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Why Are Cavemen White ?

Science is convinced that man evolved from an ancestor shared with modern apes. This is based on a number of bone fragments found in Africa and a DNA analysis that shows chimpanzees and man have approximately 98% common DNA. Of course this is tantamount to saying that the only difference between Helium ( a gas) and Lithium ( a metal) is one electron. Everything in the universe is composed of protons, electrons, and neutrons that are precisely alike but quite obviously how these things are combined makes a great deal of difference, therefore, to conclude man and chimpanzee have a common ancestor on this evidence is really not convincing.

The Bible – given some latitude for poetic license – describes the Big Bang and subsequent development of life on Earth fairly accurately, but it is much less clear when describing the emergence of man. Adam was the first man and Eve the first woman but then there was Lilith who seems to have preceded Eve. Then there was Cain and Abel who somehow acquired wives and the source of these wives is a little mysterious but at the least indicate that there were humans in existence BEFORE Adam and Eve. So how could they be the FIRST humans? The scientific community doesn’t find this to be a problem because they don’t believe anything in the Bible anyway. To them it is just a story and even if it isn’t humans evolved from a common ancestor with apes and there were various branches of humans that simply died out with Homo sapiens being the only survivor. But neither view actually addresses why cavemen are always shown as being white when our alleged nearest relatives apes and chimpanzees are clearly black. While evolution might explain why there are different races, their origin and rationale remains a mystery, but is it?

According to the psychic Edgar Cayce the Earth – as stated in Genesis – was created in phases over billions of years and was filled with animals in various forms. The soul companions of God, given free will – began to visit the Earth and inhabit these animal forms where they could experience the physical aspects of the Earth, including sex. Although initially they could enter and leave these animal forms gradually they became entangled in the physical and this gave rise to the first human form. While this could be viewed as the first human or human-like race, they had no genetic boundaries and their intermixing with the animal kingdom gave rise to the monsters that fill our myths and legends – Satyrs, Centaurs, Nymphs, and the various mixed forms seen in Egyptian Art. So there were some human forms (hominids?) prior to the creation of the first perfect human, which answers the question of where the wives came from as well as where all of these mythical creatures came from. But these were the creatures destroyed by God when the perfect human forms – who had genetic barriers for mixing species – emerged.

Now let us consider the five races of man. Science tells us they evolved from a common ancestor and perhaps they did, but their origins were scattered across the globe according to the metaphysical sources. The White Race originated (evolved?) in what is now Turkey and Iran and spread to the Caucasus and portions of India. The Yellow Race emerged in what is now called the Gobi Desert and Indo-China but the Gobi Desert wasn’t a desert at the time and part to the original land mass where they emerged is now sunken beneath the sea. The Brown Race emerged in what is now known as the Andes region but the larger portion of their source lands is submerged beneath the Pacific Ocean. The Black Race is erroneously believed to be the first race even though only the hominids are shown as black while Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are shown as white. However, the Black Race did emerge in what is now known as the Sudan and Upper Egypt (which is a geographic joke because Upper Egypt is actually Southern Egypt). This leaves the Red Race which has always been an anomaly for science. They are a separate and distinct race who are clearly not related to the Aleuts who are oriental in origin or the Brown Race who occupy South America and Mexico. According to the metaphysical sources the Red Race – the Amerindians – had their origins in Atlantis and migrated to North America where they completed their evolution. It must be remembered that these races did not just appear out of nowhere but evolved over a period of time, but they were always separate and distinct races with a common genetic base. The point here is that Evolution as described by Darwin is essentially correct but not totally. The Five Races of Man are in fact products of Evolution in the sense of adaptation to existing conditions. The contentious point is the creation of Man himself did we evolve from a common root with apes or are apes simply members of the animal kingdom and man was the divine creation?

The Bible says that God created Man in his image and this statement has led to centuries of confusion because man looks into the mirror, sees his reflection, and concludes that God looks like him. Of course this is an erroneous conclusion because God is not in a human form but is a spiritual or possibly even an energy form, not flesh and blood. So God created our spirits, our souls, or the indwelling spirit that fills our bodies. So the manlike form that we see is the product of creation, possibly the result of Evolution and certainly the product of adaptation, but our spirits are without doubt divinely created. The primitive men we see in illustrations are really just speculations and may or may not be true. The reality – according to the metaphysical sources – is that early man was Red, not white or black and the races sprang from the Red race.

15 comments:

The Lone Viking, plus one said...

I've been reading alot about the origins of man, myself. But I'm curious to know which book led you/they to the conclusion that man started as a "Red" race? I have read that the black race was the first and I've read where the white race was first. I also understand that both India and China have the earliest 'dated' history. So I'm curious to know what book came to that conclusion.

Royce said...

There are several sources for this, but the one I used was "Edgar Cayce's Story of the Soul" by W. H. Church.

Anonymous said...

nobody knows cause nobody was there
that's why we have more than one account of what happened, there might be partial truth in some writings but we can't really say for sure, and historical documents are sometimes false due political agenda for the people who are in power at the time, racism, etc, etc, but each are a interesting read, our true history have been concealed by the ones who control the world, as the say goes, those who rule the world, can rewrite history, lol, something like that

Anonymous said...

Apes are not black They are white, it's just their hair is black, and human life started in Africa. Now they are saying that all non africans have 4 percent neaderthal genes which probably means if you take a biblical standpoint they mixed with the Nephelim after the flood.

Anonymous said...

So your answer to why are Cavemen White and not Black? Is what? I see some discussion about Science, the Bible, Edgar Cayce and metaphysics but no answer to the question. As far your statements on the origins of Race or first race you may want to address the Caucasus Mountains, oldest recorded fossils, dominant/recessive DNA, the biological, genetic and historical implications of melanin. As it says under your picture; you definitely have a sense of humor.

Anonymous said...

CAVEMEN WERE ALL WHITE CRACKERS! ANIMALISTIC SAVAGES THAT ATE THEIR OWN FAMILY MEMBERS! BLACKS WERE THE FIRST RACE AND TAUGHT THOSE ANIMAL SAVAGES CIVILIZATION

Anonymous said...

THERE ARE NO "BLACK CAVEMEN" BECAUSE YOU WHITES WERE GRAFTED FROM BLACKS! YOU WERE RUNNING AROUND CAUSING STRIFE, SO WE ROUNDED YOU ALL UP AND PUT YOU IN THE CAUCASUS MOUNTAINS FOR 2,000 YEARS! THERE YOU LIVED IN CAVES LIKE ANIMALS WITH DOGS...THERE IS NO "WHITE SUPREMACY" JUST YOUR SAD LYING HIS-STORY!

Anonymous said...

Because only white people were cavemen. Black people and Asians and those living in South America and Southeast Asia were not cave dwellers and the Ice Age did not affect them and remained ice free. ONLY the white man lived primarily in caves and that is why he is white.

Anonymous said...

TO THOSE RACIST BLACKS AGAINST WHITES HERES SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT. YOU SAY CHIMPS ARE WHITE BUT GUESS WHAT GORILLAS ARE BLACK! TRING TO MAKE US WHITES LOOK LIKE WE ARE NOTHING. BLACKS FIGHT WITH OTHER BLACKS TOO AND FOR THE RECORD THERE WAS CANNIBALISM IN SOUTH AMERICA AND AFRICA. YOU RACIST ONES THINK YOU KNOW IT ALL WHEN YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN ANCIENT TIMES. WHERE YOU THERE ??? NOT ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACISTS. GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE. THAT KIND OF THINKING (YOUR BETTER) SHOWS IGNORANCE! TRULY CIVILIZED PEOPLE WOULD NOT ACT LIKE THAT! FOR THOSE DECENT BLACKS WHITES ASIANS NATIVE AMERICANS ETC.. MUCH LOVE TO YOU !

Srikanto Bormon said...

Can science predict violent behavior and help prevent tragedies like Newtown, Connecticut? Science, as it usually does, has some surprising and kind of scary things to tell us. Apparently, no matter what kind of life you lead, scientists can still figure out who you'll be at 30 based on who you were as a toddler.

predict science

prdictions

who is edgar casey

cayce edga

are edgar cayce

what is the environment

environment topics

environment

seminar topics

water pollution

topics on the environment

topics for environment

Royce said...

I have no idea why cavemen are viewed as white and not black. Maybe apes are white and not black -- but then where did black people come from? The pat answer is "evolution" but does it make sense for black skin to evolve in hot climates while white skin doesn't evolve in cold climates. I just like to challenge scientists who always seem to have answers they cannot prove or demonstrate.

Anonymous said...

We are called hueman for a reason. It IS scientifically proven that hued beings are genetically superior, that is fact. Anything with a color has a hue to it. The deceit comes in when they, (controllers of all information to distort and rewrite) drop the e therefore coming up with the spelling HUman instead of HUEman. And for whites tagging blacks as racist you can never di anything of the sort. Why? Because first off define racist. A racist has collective powers. When we drop knowledge from fact its viewed as hate. Why? Its simple, the truth hurts coming to grips that your not the set standards of huemam life as we know it. Why do you think there's always been an onslaught against the god beings?? Why did the sport hunting become such a fixture with white men? Why? Its simple, white supremacy, to provide safety from genetic annihilation. Peace

Royce said...

This is a very interesting and controversial subject. I make no claims to having the ANSWER, but I am fascinated by the racial tinted comments I have received from "anonymous" people. It would seem to me that if you feel strongly enough to post a comment that you would be proud enough to post under your own name. I do.

Anonymous said...

Wow it amazes me how the majority of the people get so caught up in nonsense. None of this matters. The most important race is the race towards righteousness, and forgiveness, and the hereafter. The notion of any group of people constituting a "pure race" is ludicrous. It is a confirmed scientific fact that all human beings proceeded from the same earthly mother and father(Adam & Eve). The word "race" literally denotes a species or a sub classification of species. Human beings are one "single species" homo sapiens. Human and not born of different races, contrary to curtain belief. The false notion of human races is a pseudo-scientific concept born of a misapplication of the term. In large measure, scientists and others who know the true meaning of the word "race" are to blame for either directly perpetuating the myth of human race, or not clarifying that humans are one species. Humans are a species of one race. An accurate definition of racism among humans would read: "belief in the superiority of a particular group." This is an example of intra-species prejudice wherein one group feels superior to another group within the same species.
The first expression of racism did not take place here on earth. Consistent with the literal definition of the word "race," the first expression of the racism was between species, not among members of the same species.the first racist thought and act took place in the presence of GOD. In the final Testament we learn that Almighty GOD commanded the angels to bow down to the physical body of Adam. Satan, an angel at that time, refused to bow down to Adam's body. Satan "reasoned" that since GOD created him of what he opinioned are superior qualities and elements, he should not bow down to a creature created from mud. GOD banished Satan for his racist arrogant act. Satan asked for respite until the day of resurrection. He declared that he will mislead and send the entire human species astray. Thus this stand to reason that racism is a gross sin.racism is a spiritual illness first manifested by humanity's ardent enemy, Satan.
Quran[49:13] "O people, we created you from the same male and female, and rendered you distinct peoples and tribes so that you may recognize one another. The best among you in the sight of GOD is the most righteous. GOD is Omniscient, Cognizant.

Royce said...

I have read the Koran and find it filled with hate and violence. It is very clear that everything in it pertains to Muslims alone. It instructs every Muslim to kill every non-believer. It also allows any Muslim to mislead, lie, or deceive any non-believer. So you rationale about races is hollow. However, humans are a species and the races merely categories within that species.